Featured
Milestones Without Celebrations: Obama’s War Cry
by William B. AllenThe most important passage in President Obama’s “end of war” speech declares that there are no longer “surrender ceremonies”, which he seems to interpret to mean that there are no longer “celebrations of victories.” Victory, he suggests, consists in the internal strength of the U. S. and its partners. ...
Categories
- Afghanistan
- Border Security
- China
- Cuba
- Culture/Art
- Economy
- Energy
- Espionage
- Europe
- Featured Story
- Foreign Policy
- ground zero mosque
- History
- Iran
- Iraq
- Islamic extremism
- Israel
- Justice/Legal
- Media Criticism
- Michael Yon Dispatches
- Military Technology
- News
- North Korea
- Nuclear Proliferation
- Obama
- Open Thread
- Other
- Politics
- Russia
- sharia
- Soldiers
- Strategy
- Terrorism
- Uncategorized
- Weapons
Blogroll
- ABCNews
- Ace of Spades HQ
- Agence France Press
- American Foreign Policy Council
- American Legion
- American Spectator
- Ann Coulter
- Associated Press
- Atlas Shrugs
- Ben Shapiro
- Big Hollywood
- BLACKFIVE
- BlogsLucianneLoves.com
- Bloomberg
- Boston Globe
- Breitbart.com
- Breitbart.tv
- C-SPAN
- Canada Free Press
- Castle Argghhh!
- CDR Salamander
- Center for Security Policy
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- Center for Vision & Values
- Charles Krauthammer
- Chicago Tribune
- Christopher Hitchens
- Claremont Institute
- Commentary
- Daily Gut
- Dennis Miller Radio
- Dennis Prager
- Der Spiegel
- Drudge Report
- Economist
- Financial Times
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Policy Research Institute
- Founding Bloggers
- Fox Nation
- Fox News
- Freedom House
- Gates of Vienna
- Gateway Pundit
- GayPatriot
- Generational Dynamics
- George Marshall Institute
- George Will
- Glenn Beck
- Heritage Foundation
- Hot Air
- Huffington Post
- Hugh Hewitt
- Human Events
- Instapundit
- Institute of World Politics
- Investors Business Daily
- James Madison Institute
- Jawa Report
- Jerusalem Post
- John Gibson
- John Nolte
- Lars Larson
- Laura Ingraham
- Long War Journal
- Los Angeles Times
- Lucianne.com
- Mark Levin
- Mark Steyn
- Media Research Center
- Melanie Morgan
- Michael Savage
- Michael Walsh
- Michael Yon
- Mickey Kaus
- Mike Flynn
- Military Officers Association of America
- Move America Forward
- MSNBC
- National Center for Public Policy Research
- National Review
- National Review’s The Corner
- Nationalsecurity.org
- Neal Boortz
- New Republic
- New York Magazine
- New York Post
- New York Times
- NewsBusters
- Newsweek
- Pajamas Media
- Pat Dollard
- Patterico’s Pontifications
- Politico
- Power Line
- PR Newswire
- Pravda
- Protein Wisdom
- Real Clear Politics
- Reason
- RedState
- Rep. McCotter YouTube Channel
- Reuters
- Ricochet
- Roger L. Simon
- Roll Call
- Rolling Stone
- Rush Limbaugh
- Rusty Humphries
- Salon
- Sean Hannity
- Slate
- Smoking Gun
- South Park Episodes
- Tammy Bruce
- The Brody File
- The Daily Beast
- The Daily Caller
- The Hill
- The National Interest
- The Spectator U.K.
- Thomas Sowell
- Time
- Times U.K.
- Townhall.com
- U.K. Daily Mail
- U.K. Guardian
- U.K. Telegraph
- U.S. News
- USA Today
- Vanity Fair
- Volokh Conspiracy
- Wall Street Journal
- Washington Examiner
- Washington Post
- Washington Times
- Weekly Standard






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
The Annexation of Europe by Switzerland? It’s Not a Joke
After World War Two, territorial changes in Western Europe were supposed to be a thing of past. The fall of the Soviet Empire required big adjustments to the map of Eastern and Central Europe, but once all those changes were complete, European cartographers — with the notable exception of those charting Kosovo — were idled.
The EU was supposed to be the ultimate force for territorial stability among the states of Europe. As it worked towards “an ever-closer union”, it made Europe’s internal borders irrelevant — of what concern were national frontiers when all were to be absorbed into the new European megastate?
Switzerland, however, is not a member of the EU. In 1992 Swiss voters narrowly voted against signing on to what was then the Treaty of Maastricht. Switzerland, unlike most European countries, takes the results of its referenda seriously, and thus has remained outside the EU.
And now comes a proposal to readjust the borders of Switzerland. The article below reads like a hoax: The Swiss People’s Party has proposed that Switzerland annex ethnically compatible adjacent regions of France, Germany, Austria, and Italy, and thereby increase its population by 243%.
Read it all the way to the punch line at the end, however, and you’ll see that it’s entirely serious:
Now we come to the sticky part: a substantial majority of the population in these border regions actually favors being annexed by Switzerland.
And, when you think about it, who wouldn’t? Despite the relatively high cost of living in Switzerland, the sclerotic economy and high unemployment in the European Union make the Confederation Helvetica look awfully good by comparison. The idea of an orderly and prosperous alternative to the EU must be irresistible.
However, we should all bear in mind the potential dangers of pushing for territorial exchanges on the basis of public opinion polls. The fact that 37% of the population does not want to become part of Switzerland should not be minimized. A change of sovereignty that leaves more than six million people in various degrees of unhappiness carries a potential for the sort of trouble with which we became all too familiar during the first half of the last century.
Between 1935 and 1940 large chunks of European territory changed hands, in most cases accompanied by plebiscites which confirmed the overwhelming popularity of the results. Yet somehow all that popular approval failed to prevent the most cataclysmic war in history.
It’s a sobering thought, one that enthusiasts for a Greater Switzerland should ponder well before pursuing any plans for territorial expansion.