Advertisement
Featured
Muslim Brotherhood Trying to Police the NYPD
by Clare M. LopezAfter forcing the FBI and CIA to purge their counterterrorism training programs of all references to “Islam” in “Islamic terrorism,” the Muslim Brotherhood in America has turned its sights on the New York Police Department (NYPD). Image credit: Reuters Writers from the Brennan Center for Justice at the New York...
Advertisement
Categories
- Afghanistan
- Africa
- arms control/disarmament
- Asia
- Border Security
- Burma
- chemical/biological weapons
- China
- Communism
- Congress
- Cuba
- Culture/Art
- cyber threats
- diplomacy
- Economy
- education
- Egypt
- Energy
- Espionage
- Europe
- Featured Story
- Foreign Policy
- ground zero mosque
- History
- Homeland Security
- human rights
- Humanitarian
- Intelligence
- Iran
- Iraq
- Islam
- Islamic extremism
- Israel
- Justice/Legal
- Latin America
- Media Criticism
- Michael Yon Dispatches
- Middle East
- Military Funding
- Military Technology
- News
- North Korea
- Nuclear Proliferation
- Obama
- Open Thread
- Other
- Politics
- Russia
- saudi arabia
- sharia
- Soldiers
- Strategy
- Syria
- Terrorism
- Uncategorized
- United Nations
- united states
- veterans
- Weapons
Blogroll
- 9/11 Families for a Safe & Strong America
- ABCNews
- Ace of Spades HQ
- Agence France Press
- American Foreign Policy Council
- American Legion
- American Spectator
- Ann Coulter
- Army Times
- Associated Press
- Atlas Shrugs
- Ben Shapiro
- Big Hollywood
- BLACKFIVE
- BlogsLucianneLoves.com
- Bloomberg
- Bob McCarty
- Boston Globe
- Breitbart.com
- Breitbart.tv
- C-SPAN
- Canada Free Press
- Castle Argghhh!
- CDR Salamander
- Center for Security Policy
- Center for Strategic and International Studies
- Center for Vision & Values
- Charles Krauthammer
- Chicago Tribune
- China Post
- Christopher Hitchens
- Claremont Institute
- Commentary
- Daily Gut
- Defense News
- Dennis Miller Radio
- Dennis Prager
- Der Spiegel
- Diana West
- Drudge Report
- Economist
- Financial Times
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Policy Research Institute
- Founding Bloggers
- Fox Nation
- Fox News
- Free Republic
- Freedom House
- Gates of Vienna
- Gateway Pundit
- GayPatriot
- Generational Dynamics
- George Marshall Institute
- George Will
- Glenn Beck
- Heritage Foundation
- Hot Air
- Huffington Post
- Hugh Hewitt
- Human Events
- Instapundit
- Institute of World Politics
- Investors Business Daily
- James Hudnall
- James Madison Institute
- Jawa Report
- Jerusalem Post
- John Gibson
- John Nolte
- Khaleej Times
- Lars Larson
- Laura Ingraham
- LibertarianRepublican.net
- Long War Journal
- Los Angeles Times
- Lucianne.com
- Mark Levin
- Mark Steyn
- Media Research Center
- Melanie Morgan
- Michael Savage
- Michael Walsh
- Michael Yon
- Mickey Kaus
- Mike Flynn
- Military Officers Association of America
- Move America Forward
- MSNBC
- National Center for Public Policy Research
- National Review
- National Review’s The Corner
- Nationalsecurity.org
- Navy Times
- Neal Boortz
- New Republic
- New York Magazine
- New York Post
- New York Times
- Newport Beach Now
- NewsBusters
- Newsweek
- Pajamas Media
- Pat Dollard
- Patterico’s Pontifications
- Politico
- Power Line
- PR Newswire
- Pravda
- Protein Wisdom
- Real Clear Politics
- Reason
- RedState
- Rep. McCotter YouTube Channel
- Reuters
- Ricochet
- RobertRinger.com
- Roger L. Simon
- Roll Call
- Rolling Stone
- Rush Limbaugh
- Rusty Humphries
- Salon
- Sean Hannity
- SecureAmericaNow.org
- Slate
- Smoking Gun
- South Park Episodes
- Tammy Bruce
- The Brody File
- The Daily Beast
- The Daily Caller
- The Enterprise Report
- The Hill
- The National Interest
- The Spectator U.K.
- Thomas Sowell
- Time
- Times U.K.
- Townhall.com
- U.K. Daily Mail
- U.K. Guardian
- U.K. Telegraph
- U.S. News
- USA Today
- Vanity Fair
- Volokh Conspiracy
- Wall Street Journal
- Washington Examiner
- Washington Post
- Washington Times
- Weekly Standard
- WorldThreats.com






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
Who’s Watching Chinese Proliferation? Not This Administration
News reports indicating that the Chinese are heavily involving themselves in the business of India and Pakistan have become overwhelming during this administration. Obama’s commitment to India is clearly weaker than his predecessor’s, who in his White House was known as practically running the India desk. Obama’s interest seems to lie less in supporting India than in courting China and Pakistan whose alliance appears to be fairly solid, and exclusionary in nature. Who are they excluding? The US.
Much of the recent news has to do with the fact that China referred to Gilgit-Baltistan as “Northern Pakistan” in a media statement that denied that China had deployed troops to the region. Although China rescinded the statement and removed it from their state controlled news agency, Xinhua, the Economic Times reports that India’s response will be to investigate to determine whether there are in fact Chinese troops there for whatever reason, and that they would find it, “serious, if true.”
India is growing increasingly concerned that the relationship between Pakistan and China is growing to their detriment, especially because they don’t believe they can trust the United States as a long-term partner. Their concern is justified as it is well known that Pakistan’s nuclear program is less than organic and was carried on with much assistance by China. But why should we be concerned about this? Perhaps because this is another indication that China is becoming increasingly expansionary and is looking to assert authority by antagonizing India, and encouraging regional conflict with their neighbors in order to force India to divert resources from development and remain a second rate Asian power.
More importantly, we should be concerned with the event that the media is covering even less. This is that the recent Chinese antagonism of India is just a flea on the back of the major issue, the coming China-Pak nuclear deal, which was held off earlier by the diplomatic fortitude of the Bush Administration… now how’s that for you? According to the Global Security Newswire and The Times of India, India is now utilizing “back channels” for assistance in blocking the building of two new nuclear reactors in Pakistan by China.
These back channels are Austria, Ireland, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, and Switzerland. India has apparently noted the Obama Administration’s paralysis on the issue, because there has been no public ballyhoo by the administration about China violating Nuclear Supplier Group guidelines. China doesn’t see how building new reactors is a violation of the guidelines, as long as they are built at an old site. Asia Times reported in July that the administration has taken a relatively weak stance on the violation, in what appears to be more of a laying on the back, belly-up position. However, it’s clear that it’s one thing to alienate a rising power like India, but it is quite another to put on a Broadway-spectacle size display of weakness on the issue of Chinese nuclear proliferation. This is hardly an overstatement considering that denuclearization is supposed to be a hallmark of Obama’s foreign policy. Perhaps it is just the denuclearizing of America that he’s after, which could be the right assessment given what promises to be a disastrous START treaty.
For the critics who justify the China-Pak deal as being reactionary to and having moral parity with Bush’s US-India deal, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace has an excellent article on why that is just plain false.