Comments on: Elena Kagan and Iftikhar Chaudhry: Another bad call by Kagan

By: sadiarzv

sadiarzv — Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:58:26 +0000

There are few things which cannot be compromised based on our religious teachings. Firstly, if you ever find out that your Imam in the mosque is corrupt (likes to have a drink once in a while, when mood is good call his lady friend for company), you would not pray behind a corrupt man and that is what Islam tells us. Similarly being a judge (Qazi) is not a political post it is very important (being a Muslim) that a Qazi should not decide the matters that he himself indulges in. If Qazi sahib is himself a dishonest man how come he can decide the matters related to dishonesty? If Imam keeps leading the prayer by force you can’t do anything similarly if Qazi keeps passing judgments there is nothing you and I can do, but it is a matter of being morally upright. Standards of morality vary from profession to profession. A car salesman or real estate broker might not have high moral standards but you can live with it or leave it. A car salesman cannot force you to buy a car of his choice or on his terms nor can the real estate broker force you. But in religious matters such as Imam and Qazi highest moral standards are required. The removal of judge based on dishonesty is as impossible as Pakistan becoming a super power in next two years of PPP rule. Whereas a politician can always be tried in the court for any crime (committed or not), they don’t have any immunity (other than presidential immunity of limited time) or preferential courts. Judges on the contrary cannot be tried in the courts which are set up for lesser mortals like us. Judges have something exalted which is called the Supreme Judicial Council. I would request everyone to check to see since 1973 constitution how many times SJC has tried its own peers and thrown them out for corruption! Don’t we know the character of majority of judges and how much money they take for required decisions? It is well known fact that “why pay a lawyer when you can buy a judge” and it still holds true. If media is not telling people about higher judiciary’s corruption due to their unholy alliance it doesn’t mean corruption in the judiciary doesn’t exist.

By: CP7768

CP7768 — Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:46:38 +0000

Yea, this makes total sense.

By: buford12345

buford12345 — Mon, 19 Jul 2010 05:54:16 +0000

One thing that fucking puzzles me. Sorry for the language. Why are gays, and females sucking up to Obama and Shariha law. Dont they know that is a ticket to the grave?

By: DEF

DEF — Mon, 19 Jul 2010 01:16:32 +0000

SURPRISE……………………..SURPrise…………..Surprise, another one has Islamic ties, the warnings are coming true before our very eyes!!!!!!

By: Chameberlain

Chameberlain — Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:50:08 +0000

This is known to B Hussein Obama and it goes to why he nominated her. Kagan is Obama.

By: Student1776

Student1776 — Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:31:25 +0000

Kagan is just another ultraleftist collectivist/statist – well accepted in the remainder of the ultraleft collectivist/statist culture of Harvard and exemplified by their proudest ultraleft collectivist/statist Obama. The country would be better off if we declared a moratorium on ever again putting anybody from Harvard in any position of responsibility for anything bearing on our liberty, economy, environment, law or anything else important. The Harvard culture is just such a cesspool. It is ironical that even Larry Summers, a leftist in his own right, was rejected by the Harvard fools because he was too centrist. It is time for America to shun the institution and the people who are part of it and to stop funding it. Certainly there are other ultraleft institutions like UC Berkeley deserving of national shunning but Harvard is such a combination of homogeneous collectivism and actual influence that it is best off in quarantined.

By: Order66

Order66 — Sun, 18 Jul 2010 18:39:24 +0000

MyKu:

Her thin resume
at least means she has trashed
few cases. So far.

By: vaaljonny

vaaljonny — Sun, 18 Jul 2010 18:07:07 +0000

I wonder what his views on Lesbians and Gays are,I am sure Elena made her case for doing away with 'don't ask don't tell' in the Pakistani Armed Forces,no doubt the Saudis also had to agree to embracing alternative lifestyles before she would accept their money

By: Dirtt

Dirtt — Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:53:38 +0000

When did the oath to uphold the Constitution become a ticket to deconstruct it?

By: Dirtt

Dirtt — Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:50:45 +0000

Keep dreaming brother. After Kagan if you want to lower the bar for an appointment to SCOTUS then get out a shovel.

The Republicans are even more disgraceful than the DNC. One expects this kind of behavior from the infantile Progressives…