<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defeating Criminal Networks in Afghanistan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bigpeace.com/ajtata/2010/07/28/defeating-criminal-networks-in-afghanistan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bigpeace.com/ajtata/2010/07/28/defeating-criminal-networks-in-afghanistan/</link>
	<description>Big Peace</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:42:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ObamaYoMoma</title>
		<link>http://bigpeace.com/ajtata/2010/07/28/defeating-criminal-networks-in-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-39402</link>
		<dc:creator>ObamaYoMoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigpeace.com/?p=10598#comment-39402</guid>
		<description>Don&#8217;t be absurd. I don&#8217;t and I never have advocated theft and I never will. I advocate self-defense and there is nothing immoral or wrong about self-defense, unless you are seriously morally confused.  
 
I mean those regimes are all currently voluntarily waging war (jihad) against the entire unbeliever world, which includes us. As the leader of the free world the USA should not tolerate this? Do you believe that we unbelieving kafir infidels don&#8217;t have a right to self-defense?  
 
Moreover, it is not my fault that they are using their oil wealth and oil assets to finance and fund a permanent perpetual war (jihad) against us, per the dictates of their religion? I did not force or compel them to do this. Do you have a self-hating suicidal death wish or something? Is your moral clock seriously out of calibration or what? I mean what do we call people like you who are so mentally bankrupt that they can&#8217;t even find a moral reason to defend themselves? Dhimmis! Cowards! 
 
Further, what should be done with the oil wealth and the oil assets after those responsible for financing and funding the global jihad have been eradicated and eliminated? It&#8217;s not like they shared it with the people they ruled over. Do you want to divide it up and give it to the Muslim people so they could create a pool to finance and fund permanent and perpetual jihad per the dictates of their religion, which because Islam forbids the freedom of conscience under the pain of death they will inevitably do because they don&#8217;t have any other choice? With all due respect, that would be more than a little suicidal and exceedingly counterproductive. No sir, to the victor goes the spoils! We have to reimburse ourselves for the cost of the war. However, they can have their deserts back. 
 
Moreover, what do you think they will do with our wealth should they eventually win? Invest it to use the proceeds for the altruistic purposes of making the lives of the dhimmis they lord over better? Yeah right! 
 
No, theft or robbery is clearly not my motivation as you moronically insist. My motivation is self-defense because I want to save our civilization, which is perfectly moral and justifiable. Additionally, I do not advocate war for war&#8217;s sake. Hell, I&#8217;m not even advocating fighting a preemptive war or a war of conquest. No sir, I&#8217;m advocating acting in self-defense to eliminate those enemies who are currently already waging a war (jihad) against us. Is that somehow immoral? No it is common sense and perfectly morally justifiable, unless you are exceedingly self-hating and harbor some sort of death wish. In fact, not acting in self-defense and cowardly surrendering like you advocate is exceedingly immoral! Your problem is you believe that war, even when in self-defense, is immoral. 
 
The reality is we don&#8217;t have any other choice: it is either eliminate them or otherwise become subjugated dhimmis. I would not even propose eliminating them if they were not currently already waging war (jihad) against us, and unless you are some sort of Marxist or some sort of other kind of collectivist totalitarian adherent, nothing is more moral and noble than fighting for the cause of freedom and individual liberty.  
 
Therefore, it couldn&#8217;t be anymore obvious to me, not only do you suffer from some sort of severe major guilt complex that causes you to be an exceedingly self-hating dhimmi, but your moral clock couldn&#8217;t be anymore out of calibration.  
 
Finally, I want to get out of Afghanistan because when you look at the overall big picture in totality it becomes crystal clear that we have nothing to win over there. Not to mention that our entire fantasy-based and very misguided nation building mission over there, like also the altruistic nation building mission in Iraq was too, was based on stupid and idiotic assumptions with no basis in reality and is thus incredibly counterproductive, not to mention tremendously wasteful in the terms of blood, sweat, and tears. I mean even if the current mission over there has a successful outcome, how is it going to impact the global jihad currently being waged against us? It won&#8217;t, then why continue? 
 
I don&#8217;t want to surrender and give up the battle. I want to regroup and fight smarter. 
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&rsquo;t be absurd. I don&rsquo;t and I never have advocated theft and I never will. I advocate self-defense and there is nothing immoral or wrong about self-defense, unless you are seriously morally confused.  </p>
<p>I mean those regimes are all currently voluntarily waging war (jihad) against the entire unbeliever world, which includes us. As the leader of the free world the USA should not tolerate this? Do you believe that we unbelieving kafir infidels don&rsquo;t have a right to self-defense?  </p>
<p>Moreover, it is not my fault that they are using their oil wealth and oil assets to finance and fund a permanent perpetual war (jihad) against us, per the dictates of their religion? I did not force or compel them to do this. Do you have a self-hating suicidal death wish or something? Is your moral clock seriously out of calibration or what? I mean what do we call people like you who are so mentally bankrupt that they can&rsquo;t even find a moral reason to defend themselves? Dhimmis! Cowards! </p>
<p>Further, what should be done with the oil wealth and the oil assets after those responsible for financing and funding the global jihad have been eradicated and eliminated? It&rsquo;s not like they shared it with the people they ruled over. Do you want to divide it up and give it to the Muslim people so they could create a pool to finance and fund permanent and perpetual jihad per the dictates of their religion, which because Islam forbids the freedom of conscience under the pain of death they will inevitably do because they don&rsquo;t have any other choice? With all due respect, that would be more than a little suicidal and exceedingly counterproductive. No sir, to the victor goes the spoils! We have to reimburse ourselves for the cost of the war. However, they can have their deserts back. </p>
<p>Moreover, what do you think they will do with our wealth should they eventually win? Invest it to use the proceeds for the altruistic purposes of making the lives of the dhimmis they lord over better? Yeah right! </p>
<p>No, theft or robbery is clearly not my motivation as you moronically insist. My motivation is self-defense because I want to save our civilization, which is perfectly moral and justifiable. Additionally, I do not advocate war for war&rsquo;s sake. Hell, I&rsquo;m not even advocating fighting a preemptive war or a war of conquest. No sir, I&rsquo;m advocating acting in self-defense to eliminate those enemies who are currently already waging a war (jihad) against us. Is that somehow immoral? No it is common sense and perfectly morally justifiable, unless you are exceedingly self-hating and harbor some sort of death wish. In fact, not acting in self-defense and cowardly surrendering like you advocate is exceedingly immoral! Your problem is you believe that war, even when in self-defense, is immoral. </p>
<p>The reality is we don&rsquo;t have any other choice: it is either eliminate them or otherwise become subjugated dhimmis. I would not even propose eliminating them if they were not currently already waging war (jihad) against us, and unless you are some sort of Marxist or some sort of other kind of collectivist totalitarian adherent, nothing is more moral and noble than fighting for the cause of freedom and individual liberty.  </p>
<p>Therefore, it couldn&rsquo;t be anymore obvious to me, not only do you suffer from some sort of severe major guilt complex that causes you to be an exceedingly self-hating dhimmi, but your moral clock couldn&rsquo;t be anymore out of calibration.  </p>
<p>Finally, I want to get out of Afghanistan because when you look at the overall big picture in totality it becomes crystal clear that we have nothing to win over there. Not to mention that our entire fantasy-based and very misguided nation building mission over there, like also the altruistic nation building mission in Iraq was too, was based on stupid and idiotic assumptions with no basis in reality and is thus incredibly counterproductive, not to mention tremendously wasteful in the terms of blood, sweat, and tears. I mean even if the current mission over there has a successful outcome, how is it going to impact the global jihad currently being waged against us? It won&rsquo;t, then why continue? </p>
<p>I don&rsquo;t want to surrender and give up the battle. I want to regroup and fight smarter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanmon</title>
		<link>http://bigpeace.com/ajtata/2010/07/28/defeating-criminal-networks-in-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-38454</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigpeace.com/?p=10598#comment-38454</guid>
		<description>I understand Islam/Shariah and as I stated I consider it evil. I also understand theft to be evil and just because you may not want to pay for oil, and want to start wars so you don&#039;t pay for what you want to steal is also evil. If you were a man of principals above Shariah with what you advocate you would stop driving your car, stop heating and cooling your house and stop using petroleum based products. But that is not what you advocate, you advocate WARS and THEFT of another ones property for your personal gain. That also is evil, what don&#039;t you understand about that? You advocate ObamaYoMoma religion, a religion of thieves and murders, and that reminds me of Shariah. You don&#039;t want to fight in Afghanistan because it does not have enough to rape and pillage, what is up with that? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand Islam/Shariah and as I stated I consider it evil. I also understand theft to be evil and just because you may not want to pay for oil, and want to start wars so you don&#39;t pay for what you want to steal is also evil. If you were a man of principals above Shariah with what you advocate you would stop driving your car, stop heating and cooling your house and stop using petroleum based products. But that is not what you advocate, you advocate WARS and THEFT of another ones property for your personal gain. That also is evil, what don&#39;t you understand about that? You advocate ObamaYoMoma religion, a religion of thieves and murders, and that reminds me of Shariah. You don&#39;t want to fight in Afghanistan because it does not have enough to rape and pillage, what is up with that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xoros</title>
		<link>http://bigpeace.com/ajtata/2010/07/28/defeating-criminal-networks-in-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-38274</link>
		<dc:creator>Xoros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigpeace.com/?p=10598#comment-38274</guid>
		<description>HA </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ObamaYoMoma</title>
		<link>http://bigpeace.com/ajtata/2010/07/28/defeating-criminal-networks-in-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-38230</link>
		<dc:creator>ObamaYoMoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 06:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigpeace.com/?p=10598#comment-38230</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;I know evil when I see it. But do you fight evil with evil or let God control what man cannot control? You seem to want to start a jihad to fight a jihad. We may be on different paths, best of luck to you.&lt;/b&gt;  
 
How do you figure self-defense is evil? And how is eradicating the regimes and confiscating their oil wealth and oil assets evil since they are using their oil wealth and oil assets to finance and fund jihad against us? Please explain how you figure any of that evil? 
 
I mean all this wouldn&#8217;t be happening today on such a large scale if not for the biggest transfer of wealth the world has ever seen that occurred since the 1970s thanks to OPEC, which gave them the opportunity to expand the jihad exponentially. If they would be putting their oil wealth to good use like lifting up their people and not waging jihad, it would be a different story, but they are not, they are using their oil wealth instead to finance and fund jihad at the same time they are using their own people as pawns and jihadists. Not to mention that they have also used their oil wealth to buy off, influenced, and bribe thousands of Western government officials.  
 
It&#8217;s very obvious to me that you don&#8217;t understand what Islam really is and that you naively still assume it to be a religion like any other. However, people who assume that Islam is just like any other faith-based religions and that Muslims are just like any other faith-based adherents are na&#239;ve to the extreme. Islam, in stark contrast to faith based religions, is unique in the world in that it is the only religion of submission, and what makes Islam so different from faith-based religions is that the freedom of conscience is forbidden under the pain of death.  
 
For instance, in faith-based religions, adherents can pick and choose what it is they will believe and what it is they will reject, and they can also freely leave the religion if they so desire. However, with Islam, in stark contrast to faith-based religions, a Muslim must unquestioningly adhere to the strictures of the religion, as to do otherwise is shirk, and shirk in Islam is a very serious offense that is punishable under the pain of death. Furthermore, once a Muslim always a Muslim, since a Muslim can&#8217;t leave the religion, as murtaad (apostasy) is also a very serious offense punishable under the pain of death in Islam.  
 
Moreover, in Islam the jihad ideology to make Islam supreme throughout the world couldn&#8217;t be more mainstream as it is taught by all sects and divisions within Islam and by all schools of Islamic jurisprudence. Hence, because all Muslims are obligated to force unbelievers to submit to the authority of Islam or die, a Muslim must unquestioningly adhere to that stricture or otherwise risk death, as the freedom of conscience (shirk) is punishable by death. 
 
Not only that, but on top of being a religion of submission that forbids the freedom of conscience under the pain of death, Islam is more than anything else a very radical form of totalitarianism that seeks world domination. I mean look inside every Muslim country in the world today and you will see that non-Muslims and Muslim females are systematically persecuted and often violently oppressed, you will see that the unbelievers are segregated from the believers, and you will see draconian punishment such as amputations, beheading, and stonings, all courtesy of Sharia, which all devout Muslims believe to be the divine will of Allah. 
 
Moreover, the religious aspect of Islam serves as window dressing for the much larger radical totalitarian ideology part of Islam. Hence, in totality Islam is really is a totalitarian theo-political ideology that seeks world domination, and as such it must defeated. 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I know evil when I see it. But do you fight evil with evil or let God control what man cannot control? You seem to want to start a jihad to fight a jihad. We may be on different paths, best of luck to you.</b>  </p>
<p>How do you figure self-defense is evil? And how is eradicating the regimes and confiscating their oil wealth and oil assets evil since they are using their oil wealth and oil assets to finance and fund jihad against us? Please explain how you figure any of that evil? </p>
<p>I mean all this wouldn&rsquo;t be happening today on such a large scale if not for the biggest transfer of wealth the world has ever seen that occurred since the 1970s thanks to OPEC, which gave them the opportunity to expand the jihad exponentially. If they would be putting their oil wealth to good use like lifting up their people and not waging jihad, it would be a different story, but they are not, they are using their oil wealth instead to finance and fund jihad at the same time they are using their own people as pawns and jihadists. Not to mention that they have also used their oil wealth to buy off, influenced, and bribe thousands of Western government officials.  </p>
<p>It&rsquo;s very obvious to me that you don&rsquo;t understand what Islam really is and that you naively still assume it to be a religion like any other. However, people who assume that Islam is just like any other faith-based religions and that Muslims are just like any other faith-based adherents are na&iuml;ve to the extreme. Islam, in stark contrast to faith based religions, is unique in the world in that it is the only religion of submission, and what makes Islam so different from faith-based religions is that the freedom of conscience is forbidden under the pain of death.  </p>
<p>For instance, in faith-based religions, adherents can pick and choose what it is they will believe and what it is they will reject, and they can also freely leave the religion if they so desire. However, with Islam, in stark contrast to faith-based religions, a Muslim must unquestioningly adhere to the strictures of the religion, as to do otherwise is shirk, and shirk in Islam is a very serious offense that is punishable under the pain of death. Furthermore, once a Muslim always a Muslim, since a Muslim can&rsquo;t leave the religion, as murtaad (apostasy) is also a very serious offense punishable under the pain of death in Islam.  </p>
<p>Moreover, in Islam the jihad ideology to make Islam supreme throughout the world couldn&rsquo;t be more mainstream as it is taught by all sects and divisions within Islam and by all schools of Islamic jurisprudence. Hence, because all Muslims are obligated to force unbelievers to submit to the authority of Islam or die, a Muslim must unquestioningly adhere to that stricture or otherwise risk death, as the freedom of conscience (shirk) is punishable by death. </p>
<p>Not only that, but on top of being a religion of submission that forbids the freedom of conscience under the pain of death, Islam is more than anything else a very radical form of totalitarianism that seeks world domination. I mean look inside every Muslim country in the world today and you will see that non-Muslims and Muslim females are systematically persecuted and often violently oppressed, you will see that the unbelievers are segregated from the believers, and you will see draconian punishment such as amputations, beheading, and stonings, all courtesy of Sharia, which all devout Muslims believe to be the divine will of Allah. </p>
<p>Moreover, the religious aspect of Islam serves as window dressing for the much larger radical totalitarian ideology part of Islam. Hence, in totality Islam is really is a totalitarian theo-political ideology that seeks world domination, and as such it must defeated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanmon</title>
		<link>http://bigpeace.com/ajtata/2010/07/28/defeating-criminal-networks-in-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-38178</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 05:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigpeace.com/?p=10598#comment-38178</guid>
		<description>I know evil when I see it. But do you fight evil with evil or let God control what man cannot control? You seem to want to start a jihad to fight a jihad. We may be on different paths, best of luck to you. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know evil when I see it. But do you fight evil with evil or let God control what man cannot control? You seem to want to start a jihad to fight a jihad. We may be on different paths, best of luck to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: attila_the_pun</title>
		<link>http://bigpeace.com/ajtata/2010/07/28/defeating-criminal-networks-in-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-38162</link>
		<dc:creator>attila_the_pun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 04:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigpeace.com/?p=10598#comment-38162</guid>
		<description>Just nuke the place. 
 
Countries that truly want to be free and prosperous have to do it themselves. This endless nation building is a fool&#039;s errand. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just nuke the place. </p>
<p>Countries that truly want to be free and prosperous have to do it themselves. This endless nation building is a fool&#39;s errand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gwar5</title>
		<link>http://bigpeace.com/ajtata/2010/07/28/defeating-criminal-networks-in-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-38154</link>
		<dc:creator>gwar5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 04:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigpeace.com/?p=10598#comment-38154</guid>
		<description>I thought everybody had an AK-47 already and could police themselves over there.  If they can&#039;t police the criminals how can they fight off the Taliban when we go? 
. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought everybody had an AK-47 already and could police themselves over there.  If they can&#039;t police the criminals how can they fight off the Taliban when we go?<br />
.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ObamaYoMoma</title>
		<link>http://bigpeace.com/ajtata/2010/07/28/defeating-criminal-networks-in-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-38054</link>
		<dc:creator>ObamaYoMoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 03:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigpeace.com/?p=10598#comment-38054</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;&quot; House of Saud, the Libyan regime, and the Gulf States Emirs&quot;   
So starting a preemptive war with these countries is ok with you with an imperialistic takeover of the resources. Thanks for the clarification.&lt;/b&gt;  
  
Please, they are already prosecuting a hot and cold war (jihad) against us and indeed against the entire unbelieving world, per the dictates of Islam. You can bury your head and deny that reality if you want to, but that&#8217;s you. Indeed, the lesser jihad against the Jews in Israel is a part of the greater global jihad, the lesser jihad against the Hindus in Kashmir, Jammu, and India are part of the greater global jihad, the lesser jihad against the Buddhists in Thailand are part of the greater global jihad, the lesser jihad against the Christians in the Philippines are part of the greater global jihad, the lesser jihad against the Christians and animists in Southern Sudan and the syncretic Muslims who aren&#8217;t Muslim enough in the Darfur region of Sudan are part of the greater jihad, the lesser jihad against all unbeliever throughout the Horn of Africa in Somalia, Eritrea, Kenya, Uganda, etc. is part of the greater global jihad, the lesser jihad against the Christian Nigerians are part of the greater global jihad, the lesser jihads in Bosnia and Kosovo against the Christian Serbs are part of the greater global jihad, the lesser jihad in Chechnya are part of the greater global jihad, the jihad against the Christians in Indonesia and Malaysia are part of the greater global jihad, the lesser jihad against the Chicoms in China are part of the greater global jihad, the ongoing demographic conquest of Western Europe, North and South America, Australia, and New Zealand are a part of the greater global jihad.   
  
Nonetheless, unless we want to continue to tolerate this jihad being waged against us by the Dar al Islam forever, which will only become more and more pronounced as time goes on, then we have no other choice but to eradicate the regimes responsible for financing and funding it, confiscate their oil wealth and oil assets, isolate them, and then render them into abject poverty in order to render them too poor to wage jihad.   
  
The only other two alternatives are to continue to deny it or ignore it until it is too late and eventually become the subjugated dhimmis of Muslims and pay the jizya with willing submission, which would entail the end of freedom, or otherwise all out war to destroy the theological totalitarian political ideology that is Islam like we fought to eradicate Nazism and Shintoism before. Personally, I prefer the former course to the latter course. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>&quot; House of Saud, the Libyan regime, and the Gulf States Emirs&quot;<br />
So starting a preemptive war with these countries is ok with you with an imperialistic takeover of the resources. Thanks for the clarification.</b>  </p>
<p>Please, they are already prosecuting a hot and cold war (jihad) against us and indeed against the entire unbelieving world, per the dictates of Islam. You can bury your head and deny that reality if you want to, but that&rsquo;s you. Indeed, the lesser jihad against the Jews in Israel is a part of the greater global jihad, the lesser jihad against the Hindus in Kashmir, Jammu, and India are part of the greater global jihad, the lesser jihad against the Buddhists in Thailand are part of the greater global jihad, the lesser jihad against the Christians in the Philippines are part of the greater global jihad, the lesser jihad against the Christians and animists in Southern Sudan and the syncretic Muslims who aren&rsquo;t Muslim enough in the Darfur region of Sudan are part of the greater jihad, the lesser jihad against all unbeliever throughout the Horn of Africa in Somalia, Eritrea, Kenya, Uganda, etc. is part of the greater global jihad, the lesser jihad against the Christian Nigerians are part of the greater global jihad, the lesser jihads in Bosnia and Kosovo against the Christian Serbs are part of the greater global jihad, the lesser jihad in Chechnya are part of the greater global jihad, the jihad against the Christians in Indonesia and Malaysia are part of the greater global jihad, the lesser jihad against the Chicoms in China are part of the greater global jihad, the ongoing demographic conquest of Western Europe, North and South America, Australia, and New Zealand are a part of the greater global jihad.   </p>
<p>Nonetheless, unless we want to continue to tolerate this jihad being waged against us by the Dar al Islam forever, which will only become more and more pronounced as time goes on, then we have no other choice but to eradicate the regimes responsible for financing and funding it, confiscate their oil wealth and oil assets, isolate them, and then render them into abject poverty in order to render them too poor to wage jihad.   </p>
<p>The only other two alternatives are to continue to deny it or ignore it until it is too late and eventually become the subjugated dhimmis of Muslims and pay the jizya with willing submission, which would entail the end of freedom, or otherwise all out war to destroy the theological totalitarian political ideology that is Islam like we fought to eradicate Nazism and Shintoism before. Personally, I prefer the former course to the latter course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanmon</title>
		<link>http://bigpeace.com/ajtata/2010/07/28/defeating-criminal-networks-in-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-38018</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 02:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigpeace.com/?p=10598#comment-38018</guid>
		<description>&quot; House of Saud, the Libyan regime, and the Gulf States Emirs&quot; 
So starting a preemptive war with these countries is ok with you with an imperialistic takeover of the resources. Thanks for the clarification.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot; House of Saud, the Libyan regime, and the Gulf States Emirs&quot;<br />
So starting a preemptive war with these countries is ok with you with an imperialistic takeover of the resources. Thanks for the clarification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ObamaYoMoma</title>
		<link>http://bigpeace.com/ajtata/2010/07/28/defeating-criminal-networks-in-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-37998</link>
		<dc:creator>ObamaYoMoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigpeace.com/?p=10598#comment-37998</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;&quot;render as many Muslims as possible into abject poverty&quot;  
How do you suggest we do that without starting another war? &lt;/b&gt; 
 
Whether you are aware of it or not, the Dar al Islam is currently pursuing a global jihad against all unbelievers and this eternal jihad against all unbelievers is permanent until Islam has been made supreme throughout the world. Furthermore, this eternal jihad has been ongoing continuously ever since the days when Muhammad was still rampaging, pillaging, raping, and murdering unbelievers in the Arabian Peninsular. Please reference the following Koranic verse: 
 
8:39. And fight them until there is no more &lt;b&gt;Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allah) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allah Alone [in the whole of the world]. &lt;/b&gt;  But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allah), then certainly, Allah is All-Seer of what they do. 
 
Hence, because of the permanent nature of the eternal global jihad, unless we want to tolerate it forever, we should take whatever steps are necessary to alleviate it. Therefore, I propose that instead of spinning our wheels by chasing hydra-headed terrorists in far away places like backwards and primitive Afghanistan, that we instead go after and eradicate the regimes that finance and fund the global jihad and make it all possible, primarily the House of Saud, the Libyan regime, and the Gulf States Emirs, and also confiscate their oil wealth and oil assets. I mean because these regimes are using their oil wealth and oil assets to prosecute a global jihad against us, then they should be made to forfeit their oil wealth and oil assets.  
 
In conjunction with the above, Islam and the practice thereof in all Western countries should be outlawed, banned, and reversed, and then the Dar al Islam should be isolated, which would render them into abject poverty because with the exception of mayhem, murder, and misery, Islam in itself isn&#8217;t capable of producing anything else on its own.  
 
Hence, if we reduce them all into abject poverty, the Muslims will be too poor to pursue eternal jihad per the mandates and dictates of their religion. Furthermore, with the Muslims being so isolated and forced to stew in their Islamic paradises for decades, the majority of them will eventually begin to understand the corruptness of Islam.  
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>&quot;render as many Muslims as possible into abject poverty&quot;<br />
How do you suggest we do that without starting another war? </b> </p>
<p>Whether you are aware of it or not, the Dar al Islam is currently pursuing a global jihad against all unbelievers and this eternal jihad against all unbelievers is permanent until Islam has been made supreme throughout the world. Furthermore, this eternal jihad has been ongoing continuously ever since the days when Muhammad was still rampaging, pillaging, raping, and murdering unbelievers in the Arabian Peninsular. Please reference the following Koranic verse: </p>
<p>8:39. And fight them until there is no more <b>Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allah) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allah Alone [in the whole of the world]. </b>  But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allah), then certainly, Allah is All-Seer of what they do. </p>
<p>Hence, because of the permanent nature of the eternal global jihad, unless we want to tolerate it forever, we should take whatever steps are necessary to alleviate it. Therefore, I propose that instead of spinning our wheels by chasing hydra-headed terrorists in far away places like backwards and primitive Afghanistan, that we instead go after and eradicate the regimes that finance and fund the global jihad and make it all possible, primarily the House of Saud, the Libyan regime, and the Gulf States Emirs, and also confiscate their oil wealth and oil assets. I mean because these regimes are using their oil wealth and oil assets to prosecute a global jihad against us, then they should be made to forfeit their oil wealth and oil assets.  </p>
<p>In conjunction with the above, Islam and the practice thereof in all Western countries should be outlawed, banned, and reversed, and then the Dar al Islam should be isolated, which would render them into abject poverty because with the exception of mayhem, murder, and misery, Islam in itself isn&rsquo;t capable of producing anything else on its own.  </p>
<p>Hence, if we reduce them all into abject poverty, the Muslims will be too poor to pursue eternal jihad per the mandates and dictates of their religion. Furthermore, with the Muslims being so isolated and forced to stew in their Islamic paradises for decades, the majority of them will eventually begin to understand the corruptness of Islam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

